I think it divided the exponential. But what do I know? I'm only taking Algebra 1. I think it divided the exponential. But what do I know? I'm only taking Algebra 1. :roll:
f(x) would be function but I'm completely clueless/ful about the others.
C means constant eh?
So function = constant which would make constant function and...
Bleh, I don't know any of this stuff, still stuck in crappy Geometry class and I'll have the (O Noes! Teh nightmare!) same teacher when I get into programming class.
I'm prolly sure you're smarter than the 70-ish cat lady in my class. f(x) would be function but I'm completely clueless/ful about the others.
C means constant eh?
So function = constant which would make constant function and...
Bleh, I don't know any of this stuff, still stuck in crappy Geometry class and I'll have the (O Noes! Teh nightmare!) same teacher when I get into programming class.
I'm prolly sure you're smarter than the 70-ish cat lady in my class. :roll:
"Anonymous1157" said: I think it divided the exponential. But what do I know? I'm only taking Algebra 1.
Algebra 1? Well, "Maths 2" here literally translates into "Mastery in Arts of Trigonometric and Hell of Statistics" =__=
Maths can make you mad in one week. Especially if it's the final exams [quote="Anonymous1157"]I think it divided the exponential. But what do I know? I'm only taking Algebra 1. :roll:[/quote]Algebra 1? Well, "Maths 2" here literally translates into "[b]M[/b]astery in [b]A[/b]rts of [b]T[/b]rigonometric and [b]H[/b]ell of [b]S[/b]tatistics" =__=
Maths can make you mad in one week. Especially if it's the final exams :P
I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.
"Idiota" said: I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.
I don't understand math terms at all, otherwise I wouldn't be so baffled.[quote="Idiota"]I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.[/quote]
I don't understand math terms at all, otherwise I wouldn't be so baffled.
"Idiota" said: I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.
Wikipedia is your friend. Search for it in the Dutch one, if it's there, it'll probably have a link to the English page (and thus, name) in the column at the left. Most of the names are similar anyway.[quote="Idiota"]I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.[/quote]Wikipedia is your friend. Search for it in the Dutch one, if it's there, it'll probably have a link to the English page (and thus, name) in the column at the left. Most of the names are similar anyway.
"Idiota" said: I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.
Wikipedia is your friend. Search for it in the Dutch one, if it's there, it'll probably have a link to the English page (and thus, name) in the column at the left. Most of the names are similar anyway.
Besides, you could obviously just explain it to us without writing any words. I learn fast, so there's a chance I'll know what you're talking about. I dunno about you guys, though.[quote="Amarth"][quote="Idiota"]I don't understand math terms in English, sadly, otherwise I'd have baffled you all with my knowledge.[/quote]Wikipedia is your friend. Search for it in the Dutch one, if it's there, it'll probably have a link to the English page (and thus, name) in the column at the left. Most of the names are similar anyway.[/quote]Besides, you could obviously just explain it to us without writing any words. I learn fast, so there's a chance I'll know what you're talking about. I dunno about you guys, though.
"Anonymous1157" said: Besides, you could obviously just explain it to us without writing any words. I learn fast, so there's a chance I'll know what you're talking about. I dunno about you guys, though.
Um, no. Maths (like sciences and actually everything) needs correct terms. If you have to explain what a vector space is every time you need one, we'd never make progress. It's kind of the aim, in that you just label a thing and that everyone knows what it's about, or can do his own research. If I can prove that set X with operations + and . is a vector space, then I can immediately talk about eigenvectors, dual spaces and everything. If I need to explain every time what I'm doing when using eigenvectors, then... No.
Note: you are not supposed to understand the above terms, but you are encouraged to do research around them. They are one of the basics of higher maths.[quote="Anonymous1157"]Besides, you could obviously just explain it to us without writing any words. I learn fast, so there's a chance I'll know what you're talking about. I dunno about you guys, though.[/quote]Um, no. Maths (like sciences and actually everything) needs correct terms. If you have to explain what a vector space is every time you need one, we'd never make progress. It's kind of the aim, in that you just label a thing and that everyone knows what it's about, or can do his own research. If I can prove that set X with operations + and . is a vector space, then I can immediately talk about eigenvectors, dual spaces and everything. If I need to explain every time what I'm doing when using eigenvectors, then... No.
Note: you are not supposed to understand the above terms, but you are encouraged to do research around them. They are one of the basics of higher maths.
You misunderstood me, but what I meant is so obvious that I don't feel like explaining myself.You misunderstood me, but what I meant is so obvious that I don't feel like explaining myself.
My last one (it was about functions) had an exercise with a graphic, which represented the variation of Temperature of a room for 12 hours(8:30-20:30). And so: 3.3 In your opinion, does the room have any warming system?
At first I though I had to do some weirdo explanations. XDMaths Tests are fun sometimes.
My last one (it was about functions) had an exercise with a graphic, which represented the variation of Temperature of a room for 12 hours(8:30-20:30).
And so:
[b]3.3[/b] In your opinion, does the room have any warming system?
At first I though I had to do some [i]weirdo[/i] explanations. XD
Because if it was here, I would be told to write the equation for the graphs instead, and explain things as "THEY" see fit...... I am speechless... who made that exam?
Because if it was here, I would be told to write the equation for the graphs instead, and explain things as "THEY" see fit.
I learned this in kindergarden...I think the teacher was on pot 1+1=67
67+67=5
5+5=69
69+69=96
96+96=1/2
1/2+1/2=21,351,453,186,153,435,415,318,676,595,616,943,944,819,865
I learned this in kindergarden...I think the teacher was on pot :?
I know it's not true, but... XD1+1!=67
-.-
New topic: Is [u]0.99999999=1[/u] ?
Well, here's some calculations I made:
[code]0.999999999999=1
9.999999999999=10
9=10-0.999999999999
9=9.0000000000000000...[/code]
I know it's not true, but... XD
It is true, though. That is about the standard argument to prove that 0.99.. = 1.[quote="E_net4"]New topic: Is [u]0.99999999=1[/u] ?
Well, here's some calculations I made:
[code]0.999999999999=1
9.999999999999=10
9=10-0.999999999999
9=9.0000000000000000...[/code]
I know it's not true, but... XD[/quote]It is true, though. That is about the standard argument to prove that 0.99.. = 1.
And the very problem is that we cannot represent the tiny little part of 9.00000... Even calculators say that 0.99999999=1, but it's not the same method. XDAnd the very problem is that we cannot represent the [i]tiny little [/i]part of 9.00000...
Even calculators say that 0.99999999=1, but it's not the same method. XD
It is true, though. That is about the standard argument to prove that 0.99.. = 1.
I dont get it. Shouldnt 10-0.999999999999 be 9.000000000001?[quote="Amarth"][quote="E_net4"]New topic: Is [u]0.99999999=1[/u] ?
Well, here's some calculations I made:
[code]0.999999999999=1
9.999999999999=10
9=10-0.999999999999
9=9.0000000000000000...[/code]
I know it's not true, but... XD[/quote]It is true, though. That is about the standard argument to prove that 0.99.. = 1.[/quote]
I dont get it. Shouldnt 10-0.999999999999 be 9.000000000001?
Yes, but as we say 9.999999999999999999... the 9's continue to infinity. So there's no way to show the missing part, and then 9=9, as in, 0.99999999999=1Yes, but as we say 9.999999999999999999... the 9's continue to infinity.
So there's no way to show the missing part, and then 9=9, as in, 0.99999999999=1
Hey, thats a entirely valid solution to a problem! [quote="E_net4"]It just sounds silly.
Like in:
[code]
6+X/2=12Y-56/X^2
Then a miracle happens...
X=42
[/code][/quote]
Hey, thats a entirely valid solution to a problem! :wink:
Well, 42 IS the answer to life, the universe AND everything.
And since it's the answer to EVERYTHING, every mathematical calculation should support having "42" as the answer. [quote="E_net4"]It just sounds silly.
Like in:
[code]
6+X/2=12Y-56/X^2
Then a miracle happens...
X=42
[/code][/quote]
Well, 42 IS the answer to life, the universe AND everything.
And since it's the answer to EVERYTHING, every mathematical calculation should support having "42" as the answer. :lol:
Well, 42 IS the answer to life, the universe AND everything.
And since it's the answer to EVERYTHING, every mathematical calculation should support having "42" as the answer.
Oh yea? Support this!
y=z/x-42
X cant be 42 here, thus your statement is wrong! 42 Is NOT the answer to life, the universe and everything!
... -14540 *Universe breaks* EDIT: And yes, I did read Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.[quote="Grim Reaper"][quote="E_net4"]It just sounds silly.
Like in:
[code]
6+X/2=12Y-56/X^2
Then a miracle happens...
X=42
[/code][/quote]
Well, 42 IS the answer to life, the universe AND everything.
And since it's the answer to EVERYTHING, every mathematical calculation should support having "42" as the answer. :lol:[/quote]
Oh yea?
Support this!
y=z/x-42
X cant be 42 here, thus your statement is wrong! 42 Is NOT the answer to life, the universe and everything!
...
-14540
*Universe breaks*
EDIT: And yes, I did read Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
Actually, once, in a maths test, I had no idea on the answer of a question, so I input "42". The tests came back, and it read: "Please include the calculations." I had almost full points of it. I wonder if my maths teacher would agree on that. :P
Actually, once, in a maths test, I had no idea on the answer of a question, so I input "42". The tests came back, and it read: "Please include the calculations." I had almost full points of it. ;)
"Murska" said: Actually, once, in a maths test, I had no idea on the answer of a question, so I input "42". The tests came back, and it read: "Please include the calculations." I had almost full points of it.
Why. Why that never happens to me?[quote="Murska"]Actually, once, in a maths test, I had no idea on the answer of a question, so I input "42". The tests came back, and it read: "Please include the calculations." I had almost full points of it. ;)[/quote]
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Why. Why that never happens to me?
"Pete" said: /me wonders why no one ever though of using 0.[put infinite zeros here]1...
It is mathematically impossible. You cannot end an infinite sequence with a 1, by the very nature of infinite.[quote="Pete"]/me wonders why no one ever though of using 0.[put infinite zeros here]1...[/quote]It is mathematically impossible. You cannot end an infinite sequence with a 1, by the very nature of infinite.
"Pete" said: /me wonders why no one ever though of using 0.[put infinite zeros here]1...
It is mathematically impossible. You cannot end an infinite sequence with a 1, by the very nature of infinite.
So you can't have 0.11111111... ? [quote="Amarth"][quote="Pete"]/me wonders why no one ever though of using 0.[put infinite zeros here]1...[/quote]It is mathematically impossible. You cannot end an infinite sequence with a 1, by the very nature of infinite.[/quote]
So you can't have 0.11111111... ? :P
If someone asks me what is the difference of 0.999999... and 1, I say him to finish writing all the nines and then I'll answer.If someone asks me what is the difference of 0.999999... and 1, I say him to finish writing all the nines and then I'll answer.
Infinite is evil. If you let it sneak in once, it assimilates everything. For example: 0[infinite 9s] takes an infinite time to write, infinite time to read, infinite time to understand, the resulting number from10-0[infinite 9s] will be 9.[infinite 0s]1... Yuck!Infinite is evil. If you let it sneak in once, it assimilates everything. For example: 0[infinite 9s] takes an infinite time to write, infinite time to read, infinite time to understand, the resulting number from10-0[infinite 9s] will be 9.[infinite 0s]1... Yuck!